As is the case, for example, in the US, in France and Germany, the Executive (Cabinet) is not formed only from elected persons. In France and in Holland, persons appointed as ministers are required to leave parliament.
In the Westminster (British) system all ministers have to be members of Parliament or of the Upper House, the Lords. Same in Australia, Canada, NZ, India, Ireland etc. The South African Constitution provides that the President may select no more than two ministers from outside the Assembly - these ministers have the same relationship with parliament as other Cabinet ministers.
So it is here in Mauritius that all ministers have to be appointed from members of Parliament, with the exception of the Attorney General who can be anyone qualified in law.
This exception (for 1 non-elected minister) should be broadened to allow the inclusion of a number of ministers (3? 5? more?) chosen from outside Parliament, from top-level professionals in their respective fields. Especially so for technical ministries such as tertiary education, agriculture, transport, energy, industry, tourism, environment and even economics and finance. Not that these ministers must necessarily come from outside but such amendment will allow the PM/President the choice and freedom to construct the best, highest level cabinet-team that can be had, Parliament retaining its essentially legislative function.
Top-level competence, Singapore style, is essential today and surely in the coming years, at the highest level of governance (at policy/strategy/ decision-making levels) which will be determinant in the survival and success of any state, especially of course small isolated island states like ours. Destructive incompetence, or else insignificant rate of progress and development, as quite a few ministers have shown since independence, must in any case be something of the past. If you can't do it you have no right to be there!
For a lean and strong government, ministers need to be professionally appointed based on their expertise and experience. The appointment of Ministers from outside Parliament enables the choice of better and capable persons to hold the office of Minister instead of relying ONLY on elected members of Parliament who may sometimes non-professionals, career politicians. Such non-parliamentary ministers will have more time and energy to concentrate on running the government instead of worrying about matters of constituency.
We are, in Mauritius, in many instances, still at the primitive level of choosing ministers (especially in a Government with a slim majority) for their ethnic, class, caste or socio-cultural appurtenances. Ditto for heads of some para-statal bodies, Commissions etc.
As we prepare to vote constitutional amendments to the electoral system, the above amendment to allow specialist non-elected ministers would be an additional move forward for Mauritius.
Commentaires
Raheem Gopaul, ki aktif dan Old Royals ek dan Grup Rafal, finn avoy mwa sa lartik-la pu gagn mo reaksyon. Ala saki monn ekrir li:
Ola Raheem,
1. Mo pa dakor ar propozisyon Michael.
2. Kuma ena koze reform dan ler, tu kalite lintere pe profit lokazyon pu pus zot pwin.
3. Michael pe propoz enn kabine elitis ki pa neseser pas par elexion
4. Largiman "konpetans teknik" sonn byen.
5. Me danze, seki bann minis "teknisyen" dekonekte ar realite lavi Morisyen komin.
6. Ek pena garanti ki zot pu mwins koronpi.
7. Anfet, danze koripsyon-la pli gran, paski minis "teknisyen" pli byen ekipe pu fer lobying anfaver bann lintere okilt.
8. Li pa neseser ki enn dokter minis lasante, enn profeser minis ledikasyon, enn gran planter minis lagrikiltir, etc.
9. Seki inportan, seki depite eli viv an proximite avec elekter. Ek li sirtu inportan ki li ena enn vizyon - sipa so prop vizyon, sipa vizyon so parti.
10. Apresa, li bizin antur li ar tu bann konpetans teknik ki li kapav rasanble pu met so vizyon an pratik.
11. Sori, mo gagn linpresyon Michael ule vinn minis san sali so lame (ek so sulye) dan kanpagn elektoral! Si bann teknokrat ule vinn minis, zot oblize zot usi pas par simen elektoral.
12. Par kont, mo dakor ar prinsip "age" me sirtu "term limit", pu depite, minis ek premye minis. Mo kwar apre de manda, enn depite, enn minis, enn pm bizin konn retir zot ek les laplas pu lezot - zenn ek vye.
13. Ek mwa pwin ki mo ule puse avek tu mo lafors, se reform finans politik ek elektoral, pu rann sa totalman piblik ek transparan, ek ferm laport ki bann "vested interests" pe servi ful-ful pu pirat eleksyon ek azenda lezislatif - setadir pu viol demokrasi ek fer lelektora vinn burik!
Salaam,
Jooneed
1.Party leaders should not stand as candidates, they should stay out of parliament to maintain the party ideals and sanctions any short comings on behalf of the elected.
2. Ministers should not be allowed to vote in the making of Laws, this should be left to the parliamentarians with no ministerial port folio, we have had too much of blunder
Idee interesante mais prematuree... Commencons plutot a donner du travail a tout ces jeunes qui en ont besoin.
Two clarifications:
1. In India even the PM needs not be a member of Parliament. For example, the current Indian PM is not a member of Parliament.
2. In Mauritius, besides the Attorney General, the Speaker of the House can also be a non-member of Parliament.